yesterday
tomorrow

August 24, 2008

RIAA, why you gotta bring us down…

Dear Consumer,

The Recording Industry Association of America. If you don’t know who they are already, let me summarize for you; They are a bunch of morons looking out of the music industry while single-handedly alienating music listeners and shooting themselves in the foot.

Ok, so maybe not every listener, but at least all of the ones who find their tunes on the internet. In essence, if you’ve ever copied a CD to your computer, listened to internet radio (Pandora included), recorded a song on your XM satellite radio to listen to later or downloaded anything from Napster, Limewire, KaZaA, Bittorrent, et al, You’ve broken the law.

And don’t you think for one hot second that you are outside their reach. The RIAA has sued corporations big and small, people young and old, the homeless and the computerless, even the dead!

So why would a company do such a thing? To protect their intellectual property of course. Unfortunately, they’ve become so preoccupied with protecting their property, they’ve alienated just about every demographic. The mentally handicapped are the only group that listens to music that hasn’t been sued by the RIAA yet. (citation needed)

“Well hold on now Travis,” you may say. “What if these guys are just out there protecting what is rightfully theirs?”

Let’s back up and look at the big picture for a few moments.

Back in the halcyon days of records, one needed a fancy studio to record the music and an even fancier machine to produce the records. Then you would need a PR rep to sell your album to as many executives as possible to get your name out. That is how you get your album into the hands of a million people.

Fast forward to 2008. The only thing you need to make studio quality music now is a quiet room, a microphone, and a computer. Getting the word out? Make a MySpace page. Now your music can be in the hands of nearly as many people and you did it all by yourself! Your mother will be so proud.

Which brings me to my next point; choice.  With all of this availability and niches (Turbo Folk, Mathcore, Powerviolence?), there are a lot more avenues in which people can people can spend their money.  This phenomenon has been dubbed The Long Tail, many niche items sold to a large number of people. The Long Tail model states that given free choice, users will favor the 20% of available options while the remaining 80% creates The Long Tail.

So let’s put it all together: Producing and distributing costs have dropped, leading to more small and independent labels not represented by the RIAA. User choice and convenience has increased through the power of technology, and yet the RIAA is still trying to sell us CD’s which - for them - have the largest profit margin. It’s no wonder sales are down every year since the dotcom boom!

But what of the oh-so-holy iTunes music store? That won’t help the RIAA at all either. Instead of making $20 off your Beyonce fetish, they only make $10, halving their profit. Or worse yet, you only buy Independent Woman Part 1 for a platry $0.99, thereby reducing their total profit by over a factor of 20!

For you, this is great. If this was 1994 however, you would have bought her whole CD as you would have had no choice.

THAT is the reason their profits are down. We were being swindled. It has NOTHING to do with the fact that people are stealing music.

Sincerely,

Travis

July 28, 2008

Hollywood, We’re on to you.

Dear Hollywood,

I write this letter to you as a warning, a shot across your bow as it were. I bring these matters to your attention for your own good. I know you’d like us all to believe that you are thriving, but we all know it to be false.

No?

A new Terminator? Honestly. And how many movies based on comic books have come out in the past year ? I count at least 7. More than one every other month. But I digress. This is not why I fire shots across your bow.

Special Effects.

Roll back the clock approximately 113,880 hours to 1995 when the first Jurassic Park came out. Recall that movie for a moment. That T-Rex chasing a jeep through the night? That dinosaur was completely CG, but there was something about it that just made it so believable. Like they actually spent time on it and didn’t just hustle it out the door. Fast-forward 52,560 hours to 2001. Jurassic Park III has just come out and it is a CG nightmare. Not only was the movie itself of lesser quality plot wise, but instead of CG playing a supporting role, it was elevated to lead in the form of Spinosaurus. Lead role is, unfortunately, a place where I believe CG is a little uncomfortable.

Enough beating around the bush… CG should only be used to supplement, not replace real special effects. Hollywood, you have more money than brains, therefore I propose to you these 7 Tenets of Special Effects:

  1. Blow things up.
  2. Supplement real action with CG.
  3. Use your vast resources.
  4. Do it better than the AV nerds at home.
  5. Do something we haven’t seen before, but don’t cop out to CG.
  6. CG for movies like Transformers is OK.
  7. For the love of god reduce the number of people in the damn credits.

The value of CG has plummeted. It was a neat trick, but we all know it now. If something looks impossible, CG is the obvious answer. Change that. Rebuild your credibility. Do real effects. Tell the critics. Tell the media. Tell your fans. For the love of movies and the good of movies worldwide.

Besides, the hardest and quite possibly the coolest car stunt of all time was completed in 1974, and has yet to be repeated.

Do us proud.

Regards,

-Travis

Need to be heard?

Humble Authors

Fillet-of-Soule Fillet-of-Who? Fillet-of-Jenkins